Rules of Hady (offering) and Slaughtering
Q.1 Would prevention by law, of slaughtering at Mina
be sufficient to realise the inability to carry out slaughtering there,
especially, if there was reason to believe that a financial or physical harm
could ensue, should the law be broken?
Fear of consequential harm
for breaking the law should lift the obligation of slaughtering at Mina. It must
not be understood, though, that slaughtering elsewhere would make up for
slaughtering in it. However, what makes slaughtering elsewhere in order is
[indeed] Minas small capacity to host all pilgrims as discussed in Manisikul
Hajj. Apparently, slaughtering was made impossible, for the reasons mentioned in
the question, not for the smallness of Mina? Therefor, combining both
slaughtering outside Mina and fasting in lieu of hady (sacrificial offering)
should be in order, as a matter of ihtiyat luzumi.
Q.2 A pilgrim
secured the value of the share of the poor and the believers (mumineen) in the
hady. What is the basis of evaluation? Should it be before or after
What is of importance is securing the value after
Q.3 Nowadays, it is not feasible to divide hady into
three shares. Even the authorities prevent the owner of hady to eat from it.
Similarly, they prevent distributing hady on the poor and the believers. What
should one do?
What is obligatory, that must not be fluted for
reasons of ihtiyat, out of the said division is giving the third [of hady] to
the poor. As for eating of ones own share and giving some of it out for present
to others, they are not obligatory. Giving the third party by way of sadaqah can
cease to be operative, should it become impossible or difficult.